Counterfeit "Gujing Gong" Packaging Lands Two Suspects in Severely Punished Case

Published:2021-04-30 · Industry News

Recently, the Ruian Court concluded a criminal case involving intellectual property, sentencing defendant Xu to three years of fixed-term imprisonment and a fine of 150,000 yuan for the crime of illegally manufacturing registered trademark labels, revoking the probation part of the three-year suspended sentence announced for defendant Xu, and combining it with the original sentence for multiple crimes, deciding to execute a fixed-term imprisonment of three years and eight months and a fine of 190,000 yuan; defendant Lin was sentenced to three years of fixed-term imprisonment with a three-year and six-month suspension and a fine of 150,000 yuan.

In June 2020, Xu, who had previously been sentenced for the crime of illegally manufacturing registered trademark labels, "returned to his old trade," bringing in his "partner" Lin and hiring workers in a workshop in Pingyang to counterfeit the packaging materials of "Gujing Gong" liquor once again, including semi-finished handbag covers with gloss lamination, printed anti-counterfeiting labels, and tinplate box top lids.

In October 2020, public security organs seized 10,500 pieces of semi-finished handbags for counterfeit "Gujing Gong" liquor and 17,200 pieces of tinplate box top lids and other items for counterfeit "Gujing Gong" liquor while a driver was transporting goods. Following the trail, the public security organs seized more than 183,000 items from the two men's small workshop, including anti-counterfeiting labels, rivets, adhesive tape, handbags, gift boxes, and outer cartons for counterfeit "Gujing Gong" liquor.

Just how large a profit could drive Xu, who was in the probation period of a suspended sentence, to take such a risk again?

According to Xu's statement, by buying materials such as cardboard in bulk at a very low cost and spending a few jiao on printing the trademark design, he could produce exquisite high-imitation anti-counterfeiting labels for "Gujing Gong" liquor, and the same went for other packaging materials. After assembling the counterfeit anti-counterfeiting labels, tinplate boxes, handbags, and gift boxes for "Gujing Gong" liquor, he sold each set to the next buyer for about 32 yuan, steadily earning more than 10,000 yuan per order and receiving quite a few orders every month.

"We bought raw materials, printed them, assembled them, and sold them to the next buyer. We were just providing some packaging materials, which does not really count as selling fake liquor. We never expected the consequences to be so serious," said the other defendant.

The Ruian Court held that the registered trademarks "Gujing Gong," "Gujing," "Gujing Gong Liquor Vintage Original Mash," and "Vintage Original Mash" were approved and registered by China's Trademark Office in accordance with the law and are within their validity period, and are therefore protected by law. Defendants Xu and Lin, without the permission of the registered trademark owners, conspired to forge others' registered trademark labels, which constituted the crime of illegally manufacturing registered trademark labels. Defendant Xu committed a new crime during the probation period of a suspended sentence, so the suspension should be revoked and the sentences for multiple crimes combined. The court therefore made the above judgment in accordance with the law.

——This article is reprinted from China Packaging Network (pack.cn). Original link: http://news.pack.cn/show-377273.html

Related reading

  • Shanghai Municipal Administration for Market Regulation Releases the Sixth Batch of Typical Cases in the Special Campaign on Online Catering Food Safety
    2026-11-04Industry NewsSource: 食品伙伴网

    In order to further advance the special campaign on online catering food safety and continuously consolidate the results of governance, the Shanghai Municipal Administration for Market Regulation has adhered to a problem-oriented approach, made simultaneous efforts online and offline, strictly investigated food safety risks and hidden dangers, and cracked down on illegal and non-compliant acts such as "ghost takeaways" and false advertising, resolutely safeguarding the safety of the food on the people's plates. The sixth batch of typical cases is hereby released as follows, in the hope that the majority of online catering operators will take these cases as a warning, learn from the examples, earnestly fulfill their primary responsibility for food safety, and jointly

  • What Does Packaging "Slimming Down" and "Lightening Up" Bring?
    2026-11-03Industry NewsSource: 中国包装网

    1. Takeout packaging "slims down," letting the right packaging "carry" the right food "No more tearing plastic wrap by hand!" Since the semester began, Jiao Ke, a student at a university in Beijing, and his roommates have found that the takeout they usually order has changed dramatically in its packaging! "In the past, the plastic wrap was wound three times one way and three times the other—you'd be left doubting life itself before you got it open! Now the packaging is clean and neat; just lift the lid and enjoy the food," he said outright. For some time now, excessive packaging with "big boxes for small meals and layer upon layer added" has become excessive

  • Beijing Issues New Rules on Takeout Packaging
    2026-11-02Industry NewsSource: 中国包装网

    Buns in bags, soup noodles in sealed boxes, barbecue wrapped in aluminum foil... How can takeout packaging be both environmentally friendly and practical? Beijing has given a new answer. Recently, the Municipal Market Regulation Bureau released the local standard "Guidelines for the Use of Green Packaging by Food Delivery Merchants," which is scheduled to be officially implemented from September 1. This document, known in the industry as the takeout "slimming" standard, provides food delivery merchants with a clear operating manual, covering everything from packaging materials and usage specifications to classification methods. What is "green pack

  • Nearly 70% of Non-Compliant Items Come from Seafood and Meat! Interpreting the August 2026 Notification on Imported Food Refused Entry
    2026-10-31Industry NewsSource: 食品伙伴网

    Foodmate Network, September 2026 — The General Administration of Customs reported that in August 2026, customs authorities nationwide detected 755 batches of food that failed quality and safety items and were refused entry during supervision at the port-of-entry stage. The refused food came from 42 countries or regions and involved 22 product categories, mainly aquatic products and their products, meat and meat products, sugar confectionery and chocolate, cocoa and its products, etc. The main non-compliance item was illegal use of sodium metabisulfite

Contact us for a quote

For samples, pricing or technical support, call us or leave a message and we will reply shortly.

+86 15916881866 Contact us